Charlie Kirk’s Assassination: A Rational Analysis of Evidence, Anomalies, and Public Skepticism
The assassination of Charlie Kirk quickly became more than a criminal case—it became a referendum on trust, evidence, and who gets to define truth. This report examines why skepticism emerged, how inconsistencies compound, and why questioning an official narrative is not the same as believing a conspiracy. Through rational analysis, evidentiary standards, and the emerging role of AI, it explores what we know, what remains unclear, and why unanswered questions still matter.